Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] Implement ASM_DECLARE_FUNCTION_NAME using ASM_OUTPUT_FUNCTION_LABEL

2024-01-12 Thread Jan-Benedict Glaw
On Tue, 2024-01-02 20:41:37 +0100, Ilya Leoshkevich wrote: > diff --git a/gcc/config/ia64/ia64.cc b/gcc/config/ia64/ia64.cc > index ac566efcf19..92d00bf922f 100644 > --- a/gcc/config/ia64/ia64.cc > +++ b/gcc/config/ia64/ia64.cc > @@ -3886,8 +3886,7 @@ ia64_expand_prologue (void) > /* Output the t

Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] Implement ASM_DECLARE_FUNCTION_NAME using ASM_OUTPUT_FUNCTION_LABEL

2024-01-04 Thread Jeff Law
On 1/2/24 12:41, Ilya Leoshkevich wrote: gccint recommends using ASM_OUTPUT_FUNCTION_LABEL in ASM_DECLARE_FUNCTION_NAME, but many implementations use ASM_OUTPUT_LABEL instead. It's inconsistent and prevents changes to ASM_OUTPUT_FUNCTION_LABEL from affecting the respective targets. --- gcc/

[PATCH v2 1/2] Implement ASM_DECLARE_FUNCTION_NAME using ASM_OUTPUT_FUNCTION_LABEL

2024-01-02 Thread Ilya Leoshkevich
gccint recommends using ASM_OUTPUT_FUNCTION_LABEL in ASM_DECLARE_FUNCTION_NAME, but many implementations use ASM_OUTPUT_LABEL instead. It's inconsistent and prevents changes to ASM_OUTPUT_FUNCTION_LABEL from affecting the respective targets. --- gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.cc | 2 +- gcc/co