On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 10:48 PM, Martin Liška wrote:
> Hi Richi.
>
> That's a small reminder. I CCed Steven, but I guess if the TDF_COMMENT would
> be really
> important, it can be eventually added back.
>
> May I install the patch now?
Ok.
Richard.
> Thanks,
> Martin
Hi Richi.
That's a small reminder. I CCed Steven, but I guess if the TDF_COMMENT would be
really
important, it can be eventually added back.
May I install the patch now?
Thanks,
Martin
On 05/17/2017 02:36 PM, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Tue, May 16, 2017 at 3:53 PM, Martin Liška wrote:
>> There's one another patch that merges some TDF_* flags that have
>> very similar meaning and do not influence test-suite, because
>> nobody is using them for scanning.
>>
>> Patch can bootstrap
On Tue, May 16, 2017 at 3:53 PM, Martin Liška wrote:
> There's one another patch that merges some TDF_* flags that have
> very similar meaning and do not influence test-suite, because
> nobody is using them for scanning.
>
> Patch can bootstrap on ppc64le-redhat-linux and survives regression tests
There's one another patch that merges some TDF_* flags that have
very similar meaning and do not influence test-suite, because
nobody is using them for scanning.
Patch can bootstrap on ppc64le-redhat-linux and survives regression tests.
Ready to be installed?
Martin
>From d75cc6896b1041042c4aea31