On Tue, Oct 11, 2016 at 07:40:24PM +0200, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 11, 2016 at 12:32:03PM -0500, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> > > > --- a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/constexpr-53094-3.C
> > > > +++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/constexpr-53094-3.C
> > > > @@ -1,7 +1,6 @@
> > > > // { dg-do
On Tue, Oct 11, 2016 at 12:32:03PM -0500, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> > > --- a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/constexpr-53094-3.C
> > > +++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/constexpr-53094-3.C
> > > @@ -1,7 +1,6 @@
> > > // { dg-do compile { target c++11 } }
> > > // { dg-options "" }
> > > -// Ignore w
On Tue, Oct 11, 2016 at 06:11:29PM +0200, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 11, 2016 at 03:43:03PM +, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> > It is much nicer to avoid a warning than to manually prune it from the
> > compiler output. This patch adds -Wno-psabi to various testcases, and
> > removes dg-p
On Tue, Oct 11, 2016 at 03:43:03PM +, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> It is much nicer to avoid a warning than to manually prune it from the
> compiler output. This patch adds -Wno-psabi to various testcases, and
> removes dg-prune-output, for the testcases where x86 and/or PowerPC had
> those (or
It is much nicer to avoid a warning than to manually prune it from the
compiler output. This patch adds -Wno-psabi to various testcases, and
removes dg-prune-output, for the testcases where x86 and/or PowerPC had
those (or did warn, so the testcase failed). It also removes -w whenever
there is -W
