On 3/21/23 08:22, Hans-Peter Nilsson via Gcc-patches wrote:
From: Hans-Peter Nilsson
CC: ,
Date: Tue, 14 Mar 2023 17:04:43 +0100
Ping on contents (formatting is approved):
I needed to check what was allowed in a define_split, but
had problems understanding what was meant by "Splitting of
> From: Hans-Peter Nilsson
> Date: Tue, 14 Mar 2023 17:04:43 +0100
Ping #2 on contents (formatting is approved):
> -- >8 --
> I needed to check what was allowed in a define_split, but
> had problems understanding what was meant by "Splitting of
> jump instruction into sequence that over by anoth
> From: Hans-Peter Nilsson
> CC: ,
> Date: Tue, 14 Mar 2023 17:04:43 +0100
Ping on contents (formatting is approved):
> I needed to check what was allowed in a define_split, but
> had problems understanding what was meant by "Splitting of
> jump instruction into sequence that over by another ju
On 3/14/23 10:04, Hans-Peter Nilsson via Gcc-patches wrote:
Thank you for the review! Updated version below with your
suggestions.
This looks fine to me, from a writing perspective at least.
When spot-checking the pdf I noticed a strange
split of the page after the next after the section I
> Date: Mon, 13 Mar 2023 22:31:21 -0600
> From: Sandra Loosemore
> On 3/13/23 19:25, Hans-Peter Nilsson via Gcc-patches wrote:
> > Jan, did I get this right? This was from your
> > r0-36413-g6b24c25948265c / svn r44249, now on its 22nd year!
> >
> > I spot-checked the pdf for readability. Also
