Re: [PATCH v2] combine: Tweak the condition of last_set invalidation

Hi Segher, Thanks for the review! on 2021/11/30 上午6:28, Segher Boessenkool wrote: > Hi! > > On Fri, Jun 11, 2021 at 09:16:21PM +0800, Kewen.Lin wrote: +/* Should pick up the lowest luid if the references + are in the same block. */ +if (label_tick == rsp

Re: [PATCH v2] combine: Tweak the condition of last_set invalidation

Hi! On Fri, Jun 11, 2021 at 09:16:21PM +0800, Kewen.Lin wrote: > >> +/* Should pick up the lowest luid if the references > >> + are in the same block. */ > >> +if (label_tick == rsp->last_set_table_tick > >> +&& rsp->last_set_table_luid > insn_luid) > >> +

PING^7 [PATCH v2] combine: Tweak the condition of last_set invalidation

Hi, Gentle ping this: https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2021-June/572555.html BR, Kewen >> on 2021/6/11 下午9:16, Kewen.Lin via Gcc-patches wrote: >>> Hi Segher, >>> >>> Thanks for the review! >>> >>> on 2021/6/10 上午4:17, Segher Boessenkool wrote: Hi!

PING^6 [PATCH v2] combine: Tweak the condition of last_set invalidation

Hi, Gentle ping this: https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2021-June/572555.html BR, Kewen > on 2021/6/11 下午9:16, Kewen.Lin via Gcc-patches wrote: >> Hi Segher, >> >> Thanks for the review! >> >> on 2021/6/10 上午4:17, Segher Boessenkool wrote: >>> Hi! >>> >>>

PING^5 [PATCH v2] combine: Tweak the condition of last_set invalidation

Hi, Gentle ping this: https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2021-June/572555.html BR, Kewen > on 2021/6/11 下午9:16, Kewen.Lin via Gcc-patches wrote: > Hi Segher, > > Thanks for the review! > > on 2021/6/10 上午4:17, Segher Boessenkool wrote: >> Hi! >> >> O

PING^4 [PATCH v2] combine: Tweak the condition of last_set invalidation

Hi, Gentle ping this: https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2021-June/572555.html BR, Kewen >>> on 2021/6/11 下午9:16, Kewen.Lin via Gcc-patches wrote: Hi Segher, Thanks for the review! on 2021/6/10 上午4:17, Segher Boessenkool wrote: > Hi! > > On Wed, Dec 1

PING^3 [PATCH v2] combine: Tweak the condition of last_set invalidation

Hi, Gentle ping this: https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2021-June/572555.html BR, Kewen on 2021/7/15 上午10:00, Kewen.Lin via Gcc-patches wrote: > Hi, > > Gentle ping this: > > https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2021-June/572555.html > > BR, > Kewen > > on 2021/6/28 下午3:00, Kew

PING^2 [PATCH v2] combine: Tweak the condition of last_set invalidation

Hi, Gentle ping this: https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2021-June/572555.html BR, Kewen on 2021/6/28 下午3:00, Kewen.Lin via Gcc-patches wrote: > Hi! > > I'd like to gentle ping this: > > https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2021-June/572555.html > > > BR, > Kewen > > on 2021/6/

PING^1 [PATCH v2] combine: Tweak the condition of last_set invalidation

Hi! I'd like to gentle ping this: https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2021-June/572555.html BR, Kewen on 2021/6/11 下午9:16, Kewen.Lin via Gcc-patches wrote: > Hi Segher, > > Thanks for the review! > > on 2021/6/10 上午4:17, Segher Boessenkool wrote: >> Hi! >> >> On Wed, Dec 16, 2020 at 04

[PATCH v2] combine: Tweak the condition of last_set invalidation

Hi Segher, Thanks for the review! on 2021/6/10 上午4:17, Segher Boessenkool wrote: > Hi! > > On Wed, Dec 16, 2020 at 04:49:49PM +0800, Kewen.Lin wrote: >> Currently we have the check: >> >> if (!insn >>|| (value && rsp->last_set_table_tick >= label_tick_ebb_start)) >> rsp->last_