Re: [PATCH v2] _GCC_PICFLAG: use -fPIC for s390x targets

2011-12-13 Thread Rainer Orth
Mike Frysinger writes: >> > Building with larger GOT (-fPIC rather than -fpic) fixes this. >> >> Unfortunately, you mostly ignored my review comments on the previous >> version. > > not really. what you ask is way beyond scope of s390x and is up to someone > else to decide. i'm not an s390 ma

Re: [PATCH v2] _GCC_PICFLAG: use -fPIC for s390x targets

2011-12-12 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Thursday 08 December 2011 11:48:32 Rainer Orth wrote: > Mike Frysinger writes: > > Building newer libiberty for s390x targets fails with relocation errors: > > libiberty/pic/libiberty.a(hashtab.o): In function 'htab_create': > > > > libiberty/hashtab.c:408:(.text+0x5e4): relocation

Re: [PATCH v2] _GCC_PICFLAG: use -fPIC for s390x targets

2011-12-08 Thread Rainer Orth
Mike Frysinger writes: > Building newer libiberty for s390x targets fails with relocation errors: > libiberty/pic/libiberty.a(hashtab.o): In function 'htab_create': > libiberty/hashtab.c:408:(.text+0x5e4): relocation truncated to fit: > R_390_GOT12 against symbol 'xcallo

[PATCH v2] _GCC_PICFLAG: use -fPIC for s390x targets

2011-12-08 Thread Mike Frysinger
Building newer libiberty for s390x targets fails with relocation errors: libiberty/pic/libiberty.a(hashtab.o): In function 'htab_create': libiberty/hashtab.c:408:(.text+0x5e4): relocation truncated to fit: R_390_GOT12 against symbol 'xcalloc' defined in .text section