On Mon, Nov 25, 2024 at 12:13 PM Li, Pan2 wrote:
>
> > This doesn't look right, you need scan-tree-dump-times with tree dumps.
>
> Oh, yes, interesting the make check doesn't complain anything about it.
>
> Summaries valid vectorize cases as blow, is there anything missing?
>
> X86 uint8_t uint16_
8_t, uint16_t, uint32_t, uint64_t
BTW, how can I tell the x86, x86_32, x86_64 from the test source code?
Pan
-Original Message-
From: Uros Bizjak
Sent: Monday, November 25, 2024 4:40 PM
To: Li, Pan2
Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org; Liu, Hongtao
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] I386: Add more
On Mon, Nov 25, 2024 at 3:27 AM wrote:
>
> From: Pan Li
>
> Update in v2:
>
> * Skip lto build as no such dump files.
> * scan dump check for optimized.
>
> Original log:
>
> There are some forms like below failed to recog the SAT_ADD
> pattern for target i386. It is related to some match patter
From: Pan Li
Update in v2:
* Skip lto build as no such dump files.
* scan dump check for optimized.
Original log:
There are some forms like below failed to recog the SAT_ADD
pattern for target i386. It is related to some match pattern
extraction but get fixed after the refactor of the SAT_ADD
