Re: [PATCH v2] C++: fix-it hints suggesting accessors for private fields

2017-05-16 Thread Jason Merrill
OK. On Fri, May 5, 2017 at 6:50 PM, David Malcolm wrote: > On Mon, 2017-05-01 at 14:43 -0400, Jason Merrill wrote: >> On Thu, Apr 27, 2017 at 7:23 AM, Nathan Sidwell >> wrote: >> > On 04/26/2017 12:34 PM, David Malcolm wrote: >> > >> > > Thanks - yes; that gives information on the const vs non-c

[PATCH v2] C++: fix-it hints suggesting accessors for private fields

2017-05-05 Thread David Malcolm
On Mon, 2017-05-01 at 14:43 -0400, Jason Merrill wrote: > On Thu, Apr 27, 2017 at 7:23 AM, Nathan Sidwell > wrote: > > On 04/26/2017 12:34 PM, David Malcolm wrote: > > > > > Thanks - yes; that gives information on the const vs non-const of > > > the > > > "this" parameter, but doesn't say whether