On Wed, 22 Nov 2023, Filip Kastl wrote:
> Hi Richard,
>
> > Can you name the new file gimple-ssa-sccopy.cc please?
>
> Yes, no problem.
>
> Btw, I thought that it is standard that gimple ssa passes have the tree-ssa-
> prefix. Do I understand it correctly that this is not true and many
> tree-s
Hi Richard,
> Can you name the new file gimple-ssa-sccopy.cc please?
Yes, no problem.
Btw, I thought that it is standard that gimple ssa passes have the tree-ssa-
prefix. Do I understand it correctly that this is not true and many
tree-ssa-*.cc passes should actually be named gimple-ssa-*.cc but
On Thu, 2 Nov 2023, Filip Kastl wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > this is a patch that I submitted two months ago as an RFC. I added some
> > polish
> > since.
> >
> > It is a new lightweight pass that removes redundant PHI functions and as a
> > bonus does basic copy propagation. With Jan Hubi?ka we meas
- Forwarded message from Filip Kastl -
From: Filip Kastl
To: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
Cc: rguent...@suse.de, hubi...@ucw.cz
Subject: [PATCH v2] A new copy propagation and PHI elimination pass
Date: Thu, 2 Nov 2023 14:00:02 +0100
Message-ID:
> Hi,
>
> this is a patch that I
> Hi,
>
> this is a patch that I submitted two months ago as an RFC. I added some polish
> since.
>
> It is a new lightweight pass that removes redundant PHI functions and as a
> bonus does basic copy propagation. With Jan Hubička we measured that it is
> able
> to remove usually more than 5% of
