Re: [PATCH v2][AArch64] Fix symbol offset limit

2016-12-06 Thread Wilco Dijkstra
ping From: Wilco Dijkstra Sent: 12 September 2016 15:50 To: Richard Earnshaw; GCC Patches Cc: nd Subject: Re: [PATCH v2][AArch64] Fix symbol offset limit   Wilco wrote:    > The original example is from GCC itself, the fixed_regs array is small but > due to > optimization we c

Re: [PATCH v2][AArch64] Fix symbol offset limit

2016-11-14 Thread Wilco Dijkstra
    ping From: Wilco Dijkstra Sent: 12 September 2016 15:50 To: Richard Earnshaw; GCC Patches Cc: nd Subject: Re: [PATCH v2][AArch64] Fix symbol offset limit     Wilco wrote:    > The original example is from GCC itself, the fixed_regs array is small but > due to > optimization we c

Re: [PATCH v2][AArch64] Fix symbol offset limit

2016-11-02 Thread Wilco Dijkstra
    ping From: Wilco Dijkstra Sent: 12 September 2016 15:50 To: Richard Earnshaw; GCC Patches Cc: nd Subject: Re: [PATCH v2][AArch64] Fix symbol offset limit     Wilco wrote:    > The original example is from GCC itself, the fixed_regs array is small but > due to > optimization w

Re: [PATCH v2][AArch64] Fix symbol offset limit

2016-10-25 Thread Wilco Dijkstra
  ping From: Wilco Dijkstra Sent: 12 September 2016 15:50 To: Richard Earnshaw; GCC Patches Cc: nd Subject: Re: [PATCH v2][AArch64] Fix symbol offset limit     Wilco wrote:    > The original example is from GCC itself, the fixed_regs array is small but > due to > optimization we c

Re: [PATCH v2][AArch64] Fix symbol offset limit

2016-10-17 Thread Wilco Dijkstra
ping From: Wilco Dijkstra Sent: 12 September 2016 15:50 To: Richard Earnshaw; GCC Patches Cc: nd Subject: Re: [PATCH v2][AArch64] Fix symbol offset limit   Wilco wrote:    > The original example is from GCC itself, the fixed_regs array is small but > due to > optimization we c

Re: [PATCH v2][AArch64] Fix symbol offset limit

2016-09-21 Thread Wilco Dijkstra
ping   Wilco wrote:    > The original example is from GCC itself, the fixed_regs array is small but > due to > optimization we can end up with &fixed_regs + 0x. We could also check the bounds of each symbol if they exist, like the patch below. In aarch64_classify_symbol symbols a

Re: [PATCH v2][AArch64] Fix symbol offset limit

2016-09-12 Thread Wilco Dijkstra
Wilco wrote:  > The original example is from GCC itself, the fixed_regs array is small but > due to > optimization we can end up with &fixed_regs + 0x. We could also check the bounds of each symbol if they exist, like the patch below. In aarch64_classify_symbol symbols are allowed f