Re: [PATCH testcase]Skip test pr61772.c for lto tests

2014-08-08 Thread Kyrill Tkachov
On 08/08/14 09:24, Bin.Cheng wrote: On Fri, Aug 8, 2014 at 4:05 PM, Kyrill Tkachov wrote: On 07/08/14 10:43, Bin Cheng wrote: Hi, Case pr61772.c scans specific string in assembly file, and it is run for many different option combinations. When it's tested against different lto option combina

Re: [PATCH testcase]Skip test pr61772.c for lto tests

2014-08-08 Thread Bin.Cheng
On Fri, Aug 8, 2014 at 4:05 PM, Kyrill Tkachov wrote: > > On 07/08/14 10:43, Bin Cheng wrote: >> >> Hi, >> Case pr61772.c scans specific string in assembly file, and it is run for >> many different option combinations. When it's tested against different >> lto >> option combinations on targets li

Re: [PATCH testcase]Skip test pr61772.c for lto tests

2014-08-08 Thread Kyrill Tkachov
On 07/08/14 10:43, Bin Cheng wrote: Hi, Case pr61772.c scans specific string in assembly file, and it is run for many different option combinations. When it's tested against different lto option combinations on targets like ARM, the generated pr61772.s may only contain lto object content, rathe

Re: [PATCH testcase]Skip test pr61772.c for lto tests

2014-08-07 Thread Richard Biener
On Thu, Aug 7, 2014 at 11:43 AM, Bin Cheng wrote: > Hi, > Case pr61772.c scans specific string in assembly file, and it is run for > many different option combinations. When it's tested against different lto > option combinations on targets like ARM, the generated pr61772.s may only > contain lto

[PATCH testcase]Skip test pr61772.c for lto tests

2014-08-07 Thread Bin Cheng
Hi, Case pr61772.c scans specific string in assembly file, and it is run for many different option combinations. When it's tested against different lto option combinations on targets like ARM, the generated pr61772.s may only contain lto object content, rather than assembly codes. The scanning ch