On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 3:41 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 05:30:36PM +0400, Kirill Yukhin wrote:
>> > Unfortunately this caused PR63600. The problem is that VI_AVX2
>> > mode iterator includes V2DI and for AVX2 also V4DI, but for pre-ssse3
>> > ix86_expand_sse2_abs doesn't h
On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 05:30:36PM +0400, Kirill Yukhin wrote:
> > Unfortunately this caused PR63600. The problem is that VI_AVX2
> > mode iterator includes V2DI and for AVX2 also V4DI, but for pre-ssse3
> > ix86_expand_sse2_abs doesn't handle V2DI (and can't easily, we don't have
> > PSRAQ instru
Hello,
On 20 Oct 14:36, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 14, 2014 at 11:18:28AM +0400, Kirill Yukhin wrote:
> > * config/i386/sse.md (define_mode_iterator VI_AVX2): Extend
> > to support AVX-512BW.
> > (define_mode_iterator VI124_AVX2_48_AVX512F): Remove.
> > (define_expand "3"):
On Tue, Oct 14, 2014 at 11:18:28AM +0400, Kirill Yukhin wrote:
> * config/i386/sse.md (define_mode_iterator VI_AVX2): Extend
> to support AVX-512BW.
> (define_mode_iterator VI124_AVX2_48_AVX512F): Remove.
> (define_expand "3"): Remove masking support.
> (define_insn "*
On Tue, Oct 14, 2014 at 9:18 AM, Kirill Yukhin wrote:
> Hello Uroš,
> It seems like I missed to post uppdated patch.
> On 25 Sep 20:11, Uros Bizjak wrote:
>> I'd rather go with the second approach, it is less confusing from the
>> maintainer POV. All other patterns with masking use some consistent
Hello Uroš,
It seems like I missed to post uppdated patch.
On 25 Sep 20:11, Uros Bizjak wrote:
> I'd rather go with the second approach, it is less confusing from the
> maintainer POV. All other patterns with masking use some consistent
> template, so I'd suggest using the same approach for everyth
On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 4:12 PM, Kirill Yukhin wrote:
> Hello,
> Patch in the bottom extends plus/minus/abs/andnot patterns
> to support AVX-512.
> I've used questionable hack in the patterns.
> Instead of writing dozen similar patterns with masking
> I've simply substed them, prohibiting non-mask
Hello,
Patch in the bottom extends plus/minus/abs/andnot patterns
to support AVX-512.
I've used questionable hack in the patterns.
Instead of writing dozen similar patterns with masking
I've simply substed them, prohibiting non-mask variant in
the pattern condition. E.g.:
(define_expand "3"
[(set
