RVV didn't use
IFN for intrinsics and I am not sure whether the refactoring is necessary or
not.
Thanks.
juzhe.zh...@rivai.ai
From: juzhe.zhong
Date: 2023-06-26 21:04
To: Richard Biener
CC: gcc-patches; richard.sandiford
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3] SCCVN: Add LEN_MASK_STORE and fix LEN_STOR
gt;
> juzhe.zh...@rivai.ai
>
> From: Richard Biener
> Date: 2023-06-26 20:16
> To: Ju-Zhe Zhong
> CC: gcc-patches; richard.sandiford
> Subject: Re: [PATCH V3] SCCVN: Add LEN_MASK_STORE and fix LEN_STORE
> On Mon, 26 Jun 2023, juzhe.zh...@rivai.ai wrote:
>
> > From: Ju-Zhe
a));
return b;
}
}
It seems that assertion will fail When nunits = [2,2] , len + bias = 3, for
example.
I may be wrong.
Thanks.
juzhe.zh...@rivai.ai
From: Richard Biener
Date: 2023-06-26 20:16
To: Ju-Zhe Zhong
CC: gcc-patches; richard.sandiford
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3] SCCVN: Add L
On Mon, 26 Jun 2023, juzhe.zh...@rivai.ai wrote:
> From: Ju-Zhe Zhong
>
> Hi, Richi. It seems that we use nunits which is len + bias to iterate then we
> can
> simplify the codes.
>
> Also, I fixed behavior of len_store,
>
> Before this patch:
>(len - bias) * BITS_PER_UNIT
> After this pa
From: Ju-Zhe Zhong
Hi, Richi. It seems that we use nunits which is len + bias to iterate then we
can
simplify the codes.
Also, I fixed behavior of len_store,
Before this patch:
(len - bias) * BITS_PER_UNIT
After this patch:
(len + bias) * BITS_PER_UNIT
gcc/ChangeLog:
* tree-
