@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2] RISC-V: Support const vector expansion with step vector
with base != 0
On 6/26/23 17:36, juzhe.zhong wrote:
> Yes. I found the “return” is redundant so I removed it.
OK. Just wanted to be sure.
OK for the trunk.
jeff
On 6/26/23 17:36, juzhe.zhong wrote:
Yes. I found the “return” is redundant so I removed it.
OK. Just wanted to be sure.
OK for the trunk.
jeff
On 6/26/23 06:18, Juzhe-Zhong wrote:
Currently, we are able to generate step vector with base == 0:
{ 0, 0, 2, 2, 4, 4, ... }
ASM:
vid
vand
However, we do wrong for step vector with base != 0:
{ 1, 1, 3, 3, 5, 5, ... }
Before this patch, such case will run fail.
After this patch, we are
Ping. This patch is a simple fix here. Ok for trunk ?
juzhe.zh...@rivai.ai
From: Juzhe-Zhong
Date: 2023-06-26 20:18
To: gcc-patches
CC: kito.cheng; kito.cheng; palmer; palmer; jeffreyalaw; rdapp.gcc; Juzhe-Zhong
Subject: [PATCH V2] RISC-V: Support const vector expansion with step vector
with
Currently, we are able to generate step vector with base == 0:
{ 0, 0, 2, 2, 4, 4, ... }
ASM:
vid
vand
However, we do wrong for step vector with base != 0:
{ 1, 1, 3, 3, 5, 5, ... }
Before this patch, such case will run fail.
After this patch, we are able to pass the testcase and generate the
