On 12/13/21 10:41 PM, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 12/13/21 14:22, Martin Sebor wrote:
On 12/11/21 10:39 PM, Jason Merrill via Gcc-patches wrote:
In reading C++ diagnostics, it's often hard to find the name of the
function
in the middle of the template header, return type, parameters, and
template
On 12/13/21 14:22, Martin Sebor wrote:
On 12/11/21 10:39 PM, Jason Merrill via Gcc-patches wrote:
In reading C++ diagnostics, it's often hard to find the name of the
function
in the middle of the template header, return type, parameters, and
template
arguments. So let's colorize it, and maybe
On Mon, 13 Dec 2021 at 19:22, Martin Sebor wrote:
> On 12/11/21 10:39 PM, Jason Merrill via Gcc-patches wrote:
> > In reading C++ diagnostics, it's often hard to find the name of the
> function
> > in the middle of the template header, return type, parameters, and
> template
> > arguments. So le
On 12/11/21 10:39 PM, Jason Merrill via Gcc-patches wrote:
In reading C++ diagnostics, it's often hard to find the name of the function
in the middle of the template header, return type, parameters, and template
arguments. So let's colorize it, and maybe the template argument bindings
while we'r
On Sun, 12 Dec 2021 at 05:39, Jason Merrill wrote:
>
> In reading C++ diagnostics, it's often hard to find the name of the
function
> in the middle of the template header, return type, parameters, and
template
> arguments. So let's colorize it, and maybe the template argument bindings
> while we'
In reading C++ diagnostics, it's often hard to find the name of the function
in the middle of the template header, return type, parameters, and template
arguments. So let's colorize it, and maybe the template argument bindings
while we're at it.
I've somewhat arbitrarily chosen bold green for the
