On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 7:57 AM, Bin.Cheng wrote:
> Ping.
Ok.
Thanks,
Richard.
> On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 5:41 PM, Bin Cheng wrote:
>> Hi,
>> This is a rework for
>> https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-07/msg02335.html, with review
>> comments addressed. For now, SCEV may compute iv base i
Ping.
On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 5:41 PM, Bin Cheng wrote:
> Hi,
> This is a rework for
> https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-07/msg02335.html, with review
> comments addressed. For now, SCEV may compute iv base in the form of
> "(signed T)((unsigned T)base + step))". This complicates other
>
ject: [PATCH GCC][rework]Improve loop bound info by simplifying
> conversions in iv base
>
> Hi,
>>>This is a rework for
>>>https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-07/msg02335.html, with review
>>>comments addressed. For now, SCEV may compute iv base in the
-Original Message-
From: gcc-patches-ow...@gcc.gnu.org [mailto:gcc-patches-ow...@gcc.gnu.org] On
Behalf Of Bin Cheng
Sent: Thursday, August 27, 2015 3:12 PM
To: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [PATCH GCC][rework]Improve loop bound info by simplifying conversions
in iv base
Hi,
>&g
Hi,
This is a rework for
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-07/msg02335.html, with review
comments addressed. For now, SCEV may compute iv base in the form of
"(signed T)((unsigned T)base + step))". This complicates other
optimizations/analysis depending on SCEV because it's hard to dive int
