On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 11:22 AM, Martin Sebor wrote:
> On 03/15/2017 10:49 PM, Jason Merrill wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 6:59 PM, Martin Sebor wrote:
>>>
>>> In bug 52477 - Wrong initialization order? attribute constructor
>>> vs static data access, the reporter expects C++ objects wit
On 03/15/2017 10:49 PM, Jason Merrill wrote:
On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 6:59 PM, Martin Sebor wrote:
In bug 52477 - Wrong initialization order? attribute constructor
vs static data access, the reporter expects C++ objects with static
storage duration to have their ctors called in the same order a
On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 6:59 PM, Martin Sebor wrote:
> In bug 52477 - Wrong initialization order? attribute constructor
> vs static data access, the reporter expects C++ objects with static
> storage duration to have their ctors called in the same order as
> those of functions declared with attri
In bug 52477 - Wrong initialization order? attribute constructor
vs static data access, the reporter expects C++ objects with static
storage duration to have their ctors called in the same order as
those of functions declared with attribute constructor interleaved
with them.
In his comment on th
