On 03 Nov 11:21, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 31, 2014 at 11:17:07AM +0100, Uros Bizjak wrote:
> > I'd like to ask Jakub for a review of the above two parts, other parts
> > are OK with a rename (as mentioned above).
>
> Looks ok to me. Where the ICEs discovered just by normal make check or
On Fri, Oct 31, 2014 at 11:17:07AM +0100, Uros Bizjak wrote:
> I'd like to ask Jakub for a review of the above two parts, other parts
> are OK with a rename (as mentioned above).
Looks ok to me. Where the ICEs discovered just by normal make check or only
with GCC_TEST_RUN_EXPENSIVE ? If the latt
On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 3:55 PM, Ilya Tocar wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've run gcc.dg/torture/* tests with -mavx512bw -mavx512vl -mavx512dq
> flags, and got a bunch of fails (mostly in permutes autogen).
> Patch below fixes them.
> Ok for trunk?
>
> 2014-10-30 Ilya Tocar
>
> * config/i386/i386.c
Hi,
I've run gcc.dg/torture/* tests with -mavx512bw -mavx512vl -mavx512dq
flags, and got a bunch of fails (mostly in permutes autogen).
Patch below fixes them.
Ok for trunk?
2014-10-30 Ilya Tocar
* config/i386/i386.c (expand_vec_perm_pshufb): Try vpermq/vpermd
for 512-bit wide
