On 10/09/14 09:16, Bin.Cheng wrote:
On Tue, Sep 9, 2014 at 6:49 PM, Richard Earnshaw wrote:
On 04/09/14 07:08, Bin Cheng wrote:
@@ -1872,7 +1892,9 @@ const struct tune_params arm_cortex_a53_tune =
{true, true}, /* Prefer non short
circuit. */
&arm
On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 9:16 AM, Bin.Cheng wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 9, 2014 at 6:49 PM, Richard Earnshaw wrote:
>> On 04/09/14 07:08, Bin Cheng wrote:
>>> @@ -1872,7 +1892,9 @@ const struct tune_params arm_cortex_a53_tune =
>>>{true, true}, /* Prefer non short
On Tue, Sep 9, 2014 at 6:49 PM, Richard Earnshaw wrote:
> On 04/09/14 07:08, Bin Cheng wrote:
>> @@ -1872,7 +1892,9 @@ const struct tune_params arm_cortex_a53_tune =
>>{true, true}, /* Prefer non short
>> circuit. */
>>&arm_default_vec_cost,
: Thursday, September 04, 2014 1:08
> To: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
> Subject: [PATCH ARM]memset inlining patch for arm
>
On 04/09/14 07:08, Bin Cheng wrote:
> @@ -1872,7 +1892,9 @@ const struct tune_params arm_cortex_a53_tune =
>{true, true}, /* Prefer non short
> circuit. */
>&arm_default_vec_cost, /* Vectorizer costs. */
>false,
-ow...@gcc.gnu.org]
On Behalf Of Bin Cheng
Sent: Thursday, September 04, 2014 1:08
To: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [PATCH ARM]memset inlining patch for arm
Hi,
This patch is posted/approved before at
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-07/msg01398.html
Unfortunately, it was reverted
On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 7:08 AM, Bin Cheng wrote:
> Hi,
> This patch is posted/approved before at
> https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-07/msg01398.html
> Unfortunately, it was reverted because a latent bug revealed causing glibc
> build failure and I didn't have enough time to fix back at that
Hi,
This patch is posted/approved before at
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-07/msg01398.html
Unfortunately, it was reverted because a latent bug revealed causing glibc
build failure and I didn't have enough time to fix back at that time.
Now with the potential bug resolved by
https://gcc.gn
