On 6/23/2021 4:19 PM, apinski--- via Gcc-patches wrote:
From: Andrew Pinski
While converting some fold_cond_expr_with_comparison
to match, I found that I wanted to use "for cnd (cond vec_cond)"
but that was not causing the lowering of cond to happen.
What was happening was the lowering of th
From: Andrew Pinski
While converting some fold_cond_expr_with_comparison
to match, I found that I wanted to use "for cnd (cond vec_cond)"
but that was not causing the lowering of cond to happen.
What was happening was the lowering of the for loop
was happening after the lowering of the cond. So
s
On Sat, Jun 19, 2021 at 11:43 PM apinski--- via Gcc-patches
wrote:
>
> From: Andrew Pinski
>
> While converting some fold_cond_expr_with_comparison
> to match, I found that I wanted to use "for cnd (cond vec_cond)"
> but that was not causing the lowering of cond to happen.
> What was happening wa
From: Andrew Pinski
While converting some fold_cond_expr_with_comparison
to match, I found that I wanted to use "for cnd (cond vec_cond)"
but that was not causing the lowering of cond to happen.
What was happening was the lowering of the for loop
was happening after the lowering of the cond. So
s