On Mon, Jul 29, 2024 at 12:41 PM Björn Schäpers wrote:
>
> > Instead of deleting those, move them inside the parentheses:
> >
> > typedef VOID (CALLBACK *LDR_DLL_NOTIFICATION)(ULONG,
> > struct dll_notification_data*,
> >
Am 29.07.2024 um 19:58 schrieb Eli Zaretskii:
From: Ian Lance Taylor
Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2024 09:46:46 -0700
Cc: Eli Zaretskii , gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org, g...@gcc.gnu.org
On Fri, Mar 15, 2024 at 1:41 PM Björn Schäpers wrote:
Am 10.01.2024 um 13:34 schrieb Eli Zaretskii:
Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2024
> From: Ian Lance Taylor
> Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2024 09:46:46 -0700
> Cc: Eli Zaretskii , gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org, g...@gcc.gnu.org
>
> On Fri, Mar 15, 2024 at 1:41 PM Björn Schäpers wrote:
> >
> > Am 10.01.2024 um 13:34 schrieb Eli Zaretskii:
> > >> Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2024 21:02:44 +0100
> > >> Cc:
On Fri, Mar 15, 2024 at 1:41 PM Björn Schäpers wrote:
>
> Am 10.01.2024 um 13:34 schrieb Eli Zaretskii:
> >> Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2024 21:02:44 +0100
> >> Cc: i...@google.com, gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org, g...@gcc.gnu.org
> >> From: Björn Schäpers
> >>
> >> Am 07.01.2024 um 18:03 schrieb Eli Zaretskii:
>
Am 10.01.2024 um 13:34 schrieb Eli Zaretskii:
Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2024 21:02:44 +0100
Cc: i...@google.com, gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org, g...@gcc.gnu.org
From: Björn Schäpers
Am 07.01.2024 um 18:03 schrieb Eli Zaretskii:
In that case, you an call either GetModuleHandeExA or
GetModuleHandeExW, the diff
> Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2024 21:02:44 +0100
> Cc: i...@google.com, gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org, g...@gcc.gnu.org
> From: Björn Schäpers
>
> Am 07.01.2024 um 18:03 schrieb Eli Zaretskii:
> > In that case, you an call either GetModuleHandeExA or
> > GetModuleHandeExW, the difference is minor.
>
> Here an u
Am 07.01.2024 um 18:03 schrieb Eli Zaretskii:
Date: Sun, 7 Jan 2024 17:07:06 +0100
Cc: i...@google.com, gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org, g...@gcc.gnu.org
From: Björn Schäpers
That was about GetModuleHandle, not about GetModuleHandleEx. For the
latter, all Windows versions that support it also support
> Date: Sun, 7 Jan 2024 17:07:06 +0100
> Cc: i...@google.com, gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org, g...@gcc.gnu.org
> From: Björn Schäpers
>
> > That was about GetModuleHandle, not about GetModuleHandleEx. For the
> > latter, all Windows versions that support it also support "wide" APIs.
> > So my suggestio
Am 07.01.2024 um 15:46 schrieb Eli Zaretskii:
[I re-added the other addressees, as I don' think you meant to make
this discussion private between the two of us.]
Yeah, that was a mistake.
Date: Sun, 7 Jan 2024 12:58:29 +0100
From: Björn Schäpers
Am 07.01.2024 um 07:50 schrieb Eli Zaretskii
[I re-added the other addressees, as I don' think you meant to make
this discussion private between the two of us.]
> Date: Sun, 7 Jan 2024 12:58:29 +0100
> From: Björn Schäpers
>
> Am 07.01.2024 um 07:50 schrieb Eli Zaretskii:
> >> Date: Sat, 6 Jan 2024 23:15:24 +0100
> >> From: Björn Schäpers
> Date: Sat, 6 Jan 2024 23:15:24 +0100
> From: Björn Schäpers
> Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org, g...@gcc.gnu.org
>
> This patch adds libraries which are loaded after backtrace_initialize, like
> plugins or similar.
>
> I don't know what style is preferred for the Win32 typedefs, should the code
>
Am 04.01.2024 um 23:33 schrieb Björn Schäpers:
Am 03.01.2024 um 00:12 schrieb Björn Schäpers:
Am 30.11.2023 um 20:53 schrieb Ian Lance Taylor:
On Fri, Jan 20, 2023 at 2:55 AM Björn Schäpers wrote:
From: Björn Schäpers
Fixes https://github.com/ianlancetaylor/libbacktrace/issues/53, except
t
12 matches
Mail list logo
