Re: [PATCH 5/7] RISC-V: Recognize bexti in negated if-conversion

On 11/12/22 14:29, Philipp Tomsich wrote: While the positive case "if ((bits >> SHAMT) & 1)" for SHAMT 0..10 can trigger conversion into efficient branchless sequences - with Zbs (bexti + neg + and) - with XVentanaCondOps (andi + vt.maskc) the inverted/negated case results in andi a5,a

[PATCH 5/7] RISC-V: Recognize bexti in negated if-conversion

While the positive case "if ((bits >> SHAMT) & 1)" for SHAMT 0..10 can trigger conversion into efficient branchless sequences - with Zbs (bexti + neg + and) - with XVentanaCondOps (andi + vt.maskc) the inverted/negated case results in andi a5,a0,1024 seqz a5,a5 neg a5,a5 and a5,a5,a1 du