Re: [PATCH 4/8] libstdc++: Add missing constexpr on simd shift implementation

2023-02-23 Thread Matthias Kretz via Gcc-patches
On Thursday, 23 February 2023 12:07:11 CET Jonathan Wakely wrote: > On Thu, 23 Feb 2023 at 08:55, Matthias Kretz via Libstdc++ > > wrote: > > Resolves -Wtautological-compare warnings about `if > > (__builtin_is_constant_evaluated())` in the implementations of these > > functions. > > The 'inline

Re: [PATCH 4/8] libstdc++: Add missing constexpr on simd shift implementation

2023-02-23 Thread Jonathan Wakely via Gcc-patches
On Thu, 23 Feb 2023 at 08:55, Matthias Kretz via Libstdc++ wrote: > > > > Resolves -Wtautological-compare warnings about `if > (__builtin_is_constant_evaluated())` in the implementations of these > functions. The 'inline' is redundant now, because these are unconditionally constexpr which implies

[PATCH 4/8] libstdc++: Add missing constexpr on simd shift implementation

2023-02-23 Thread Matthias Kretz via Gcc-patches
Resolves -Wtautological-compare warnings about `if (__builtin_is_constant_evaluated())` in the implementations of these functions. Signed-off-by: Matthias Kretz libstdc++-v3/ChangeLog: * include/experimental/bits/simd_x86.h (_S_bit_shift_left) (_S_bit_shift_right): Declare con