On 26 May 2017 at 20:20, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
> On Fri, May 26, 2017 at 9:08 AM, Iain Buclaw wrote:
>> This is instead of adding a `.init$' postfix, which gave it a
>> property-style name. My rationale being that "initializer for symbol"
>> is much more informative when inspecting D runtime t
On Fri, May 26, 2017 at 9:08 AM, Iain Buclaw wrote:
> This is instead of adding a `.init$' postfix, which gave it a
> property-style name. My rationale being that "initializer for symbol"
> is much more informative when inspecting D runtime type information in
> gdb, which is the only place where
This is instead of adding a `.init$' postfix, which gave it a
property-style name. My rationale being that "initializer for symbol"
is much more informative when inspecting D runtime type information in
gdb, which is the only place where you would encounter references to
this compiler-generated sy
