On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 4:31 PM, Evgeny Stupachenko wrote:
> For the 3d part of the patch there was a misprint in estimated
> constant. It should be 1.7 instead of 1.8.
> - retval = (retval * 18) / 10;
> + retval = (retval * 17) / 10;
>
> Bootstarp passed.
The change is also OK.
For the 3d part of the patch there was a misprint in estimated
constant. It should be 1.7 instead of 1.8.
- retval = (retval * 18) / 10;
+ retval = (retval * 17) / 10;
Bootstarp passed.
On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 12:02 PM, Uros Bizjak wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 6:12 PM, Evgeny
On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 6:12 PM, Evgeny Stupachenko wrote:
> 3d part:
>
> 2014-04-15 Evgeny Stupachenko
>
> * config/i386/i386.c (x86_add_stmt_cost): Fixing vector cost model for
> Silvermont.
... : Fix vector cost ...
OK for mainline with the above ChangeLog fix.
Thanks,
Uro
3d part:
2014-04-15 Evgeny Stupachenko
* config/i386/i386.c (x86_add_stmt_cost): Fixing vector cost model for
Silvermont.
diff --git a/gcc/config/i386/i386.c b/gcc/config/i386/i386.c
index 0ae3cda..2522b5c 100644
--- a/gcc/config/i386/i386.c
+++ b/gcc/config/i386/i386.c
@@ -8
