On 11/30/20 9:02 AM, Maciej W. Rozycki wrote:
> On Fri, 20 Nov 2020, Jeff Law wrote:
>
>> ps. Yes, I skipped the insv/extv changes. They're usually a rats nest
>> of special cases. We'll come back to them.
> I've thought of actually reducing the number of patterns to the minimum
> possible
On Fri, 20 Nov 2020, Jeff Law wrote:
> ps. Yes, I skipped the insv/extv changes. They're usually a rats nest
> of special cases. We'll come back to them.
I've thought of actually reducing the number of patterns to the minimum
possible by folding the existing ones together, and then getting t
On 11/19/20 8:36 PM, Maciej W. Rozycki wrote:
> It makes no sense for insn operand predicates, as long as they accept a
> register operand, to be more restrictive than the set of the associated
> constraints, because expand will choose the insn based on the relevant
> operand being a pseudo regi
It makes no sense for insn operand predicates, as long as they accept a
register operand, to be more restrictive than the set of the associated
constraints, because expand will choose the insn based on the relevant
operand being a pseudo register then and reload will keep it happily as
an immediate
