Hi!
On 2020-03-23T16:29:40+0100, I wrote:
> On 2018-09-14T10:18:12-0600, Jeff Law wrote:
>> On 9/5/18 5:52 AM, a...@codesourcery.com wrote:
>>>
>>> The GCN toolchain must use the LLVM assembler and linker because there's no
>>> binutils port. The LLVM tools do not have the same diagnostic style
Hi!
Now that I'm looking into enabling AMD GCN offloading in my builds, I
have a few concerns here. ;-)
On 2018-09-14T10:18:12-0600, Jeff Law wrote:
> On 9/5/18 5:52 AM, a...@codesourcery.com wrote:
>>
>> The GCN toolchain must use the LLVM assembler and linker because there's no
>> binutils po
On 9/5/18 5:52 AM, a...@codesourcery.com wrote:
>
> The GCN toolchain must use the LLVM assembler and linker because there's no
> binutils port. The LLVM tools do not have the same diagnostic style as
> binutils, so the "blank line(s) in output" tests are inappropriate (and very
> noisy).
>
> Th
The GCN toolchain must use the LLVM assembler and linker because there's no
binutils port. The LLVM tools do not have the same diagnostic style as
binutils, so the "blank line(s) in output" tests are inappropriate (and very
noisy).
The LLVM tools also have different command line options, so it's
