On 09/12/2024 14:13, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
Could I ask you to open an issue about std::is_trivial upstream:
https://github.com/oneapi-src/oneDPL/issues
If/when they fix it, we can consider aligning with their direction.
And that might resolve the question of which aspects of triviality are
real
On 09/12/24 13:13 +, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 09/12/24 13:08 +0100, Giuseppe D'Angelo wrote:
For PSTL, I've just chosen to port from is_trivial to the direct
equivalent, as I'm really unsure about the meaning of the code.
Yeah, I'm not sure either.
I note that the code uses std::conjunct
re.
--
Giuseppe D'Angelo
From a24a9495976a08f19df32dddf9b0e29661aca696 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Giuseppe D'Angelo
Date: Mon, 9 Dec 2024 02:06:25 +0100
Subject: [PATCH 2/6] libstdc++: pstl: port away from is_trivial
In preparation for the deprecation of is_trivial (P3247R2).
Unfortunately I
:06:25 +0100
Subject: [PATCH 2/6] libstdc++: pstl: port away from is_trivial
In preparation for the deprecation of is_trivial (P3247R2).
Unfortunately I am unable to fully understand what aspect of triviality
seems to matter for these algorithms, so I just ported is_trivial to its
direct equivalent
