Robin Dapp writes:
>> Not sure I've understood the series TBH, but is the npeel == vf / 2
>> there specifically for the "unknown number of peels" case? How do
>> we distinguish that from the case in which the number of peels is
>> known to be vf / 2 at compile time? Or have I missed the point
>>
> Not sure I've understood the series TBH, but is the npeel == vf / 2
> there specifically for the "unknown number of peels" case? How do
> we distinguish that from the case in which the number of peels is
> known to be vf / 2 at compile time? Or have I missed the point
> completely? (probably ye
Robin Dapp writes:
> @@ -1272,12 +1272,40 @@ vect_peeling_hash_get_lowest_cost (_vect_peel_info
> **slot,
> && !STMT_VINFO_GROUPED_ACCESS (stmt_info))
> continue;
>
> + int save_misalignment;
>save_misalignment = DR_MISALIGNMENT (dr);
> - vect_update_misalignment
gcc/ChangeLog:
2017-05-23 Robin Dapp
* tree-vect-data-refs.c (vect_update_misalignment_for_peel):
Rename.
(vect_get_peeling_costs_all_drs): Create function.
(vect_peeling_hash_get_lowest_cost):
Use vect_get_peeling_costs_all_drs.
(vect_peeling_su
