On 7/9/25 7:17 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
ISTR the backwards threader simply cancels paths that had blocks in
common with another jump thread (that happened to be materialized
first). But maybe it's less strict than that. It cancels things in too
many places and while it collects all opport
On Wed, Jul 9, 2025 at 3:06 PM Jeff Law wrote:
>
>
>
> On 7/9/25 6:53 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 9, 2025 at 2:16 PM Jeff Law wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> On 7/9/25 12:27 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
> >>> The following changes the percentage that determines how many
> >>> stmts are allo
On 7/9/25 6:53 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
On Wed, Jul 9, 2025 at 2:16 PM Jeff Law wrote:
On 7/9/25 12:27 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
The following changes the percentage that determines how many
stmts are allowed for backwards jump threading from 50 to 54,
enabling the missed jump threading
On Wed, Jul 9, 2025 at 2:16 PM Jeff Law wrote:
>
>
>
> On 7/9/25 12:27 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
> > The following changes the percentage that determines how many
> > stmts are allowed for backwards jump threading from 50 to 54,
> > enabling the missed jump threading observed in PR109893.
> >
> >
On Wed, 9 Jul 2025, Jan Hubicka wrote:
> > The following changes the percentage that determines how many
> > stmts are allowed for backwards jump threading from 50 to 54,
> > enabling the missed jump threading observed in PR109893.
> >
> > Bootstrapped and tested on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu. It
> The following changes the percentage that determines how many
> stmts are allowed for backwards jump threading from 50 to 54,
> enabling the missed jump threading observed in PR109893.
>
> Bootstrapped and tested on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu. It seems that
> at least backward threading is prone
On 7/9/25 12:27 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
The following changes the percentage that determines how many
stmts are allowed for backwards jump threading from 50 to 54,
enabling the missed jump threading observed in PR109893.
Bootstrapped and tested on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu. It seems that
at
The following changes the percentage that determines how many
stmts are allowed for backwards jump threading from 50 to 54,
enabling the missed jump threading observed in PR109893.
Bootstrapped and tested on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu. It seems that
at least backward threading is prone to profile m
