Re: [PATCH 2/2] jit: use FINAL and OVERRIDE throughout

On Fri, 2016-05-06 at 12:40 -0400, David Malcolm wrote: > Mark most virtual functions in gcc/jit as being FINAL OVERRIDE. > gcc::jit::recording::lvalue::access_as_rvalue is the sole OVERRIDE > that isn't a FINAL. > > Successfully bootstrapped®rtested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu. > > I can self-approve

[PATCH 2/2] jit: use FINAL and OVERRIDE throughout

Mark most virtual functions in gcc/jit as being FINAL OVERRIDE. gcc::jit::recording::lvalue::access_as_rvalue is the sole OVERRIDE that isn't a FINAL. Successfully bootstrapped®rtested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu. I can self-approve this, but as asked in patch 1, does "final" imply "override"? Is "fi