On 7/24/24 4:52 PM, Arsen Arsenović wrote:
Jason Merrill writes:
Ah, of course, I was overlooking the assignment. The patch is OK.
Thanks. Here's a range diff with a few changes to the commits, chiefly
in the commit messages. If you agree, I can push with these changes
applied:
Looks go
Jason Merrill writes:
> Ah, of course, I was overlooking the assignment. The patch is OK.
Thanks. Here's a range diff with a few changes to the commits, chiefly
in the commit messages. If you agree, I can push with these changes
applied:
1: 32f810cca55 ! 1: d2e74525965 cp/coroutines: do no
On 7/24/24 4:20 PM, Arsen Arsenović wrote:
Hi Jason,
Thanks for the review.
Jason Merrill writes:
On 7/23/24 7:41 PM, Arsen Arsenović wrote:
co_await expressions are nearly calls to Awaitable::await_resume, and,
as such, should inherit its nodiscard. A discarded co_await expression
should,
Hi Jason,
Thanks for the review.
Jason Merrill writes:
> On 7/23/24 7:41 PM, Arsen Arsenović wrote:
>> co_await expressions are nearly calls to Awaitable::await_resume, and,
>> as such, should inherit its nodiscard. A discarded co_await expression
>> should, hence, act as if its call to await_
On 7/23/24 7:41 PM, Arsen Arsenović wrote:
co_await expressions are nearly calls to Awaitable::await_resume, and,
as such, should inherit its nodiscard. A discarded co_await expression
should, hence, act as if its call to await_resume was discarded.
CO_AWAIT_EXPR trees do conveniently contain t
co_await expressions are nearly calls to Awaitable::await_resume, and,
as such, should inherit its nodiscard. A discarded co_await expression
should, hence, act as if its call to await_resume was discarded.
CO_AWAIT_EXPR trees do conveniently contain the expression for calling
await_resume in the
