On Wed, 2023-11-22 at 20:57 -0500, Ben Boeckel wrote:
> Is there a version of autoconf I should use? I have 2.71 laying around
> but see that these were generated with 2.69. If you want me to regen
> with 2.71, I'll do that as separate prep commits so that this diff is
> sensible. Or I can try and
On Wed, Nov 22, 2023 at 23:15:56 +, Joseph Myers wrote:
> On Mon, 20 Nov 2023, Ben Boeckel wrote:
>
> > Bugzilla is preferred today.
> >
> > ChangeLog:
> >
> > * config-ml.in: Replace gcc-bugs@ with Bugzilla link.
> > * symlink-tree: Replace gcc-bugs@ with Bugzilla link.
>
> I don't
On Mon, 20 Nov 2023, Ben Boeckel wrote:
> Bugzilla is preferred today.
>
> ChangeLog:
>
> * config-ml.in: Replace gcc-bugs@ with Bugzilla link.
> * symlink-tree: Replace gcc-bugs@ with Bugzilla link.
I don't think we should use a URL that redirects (i.e.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
Bugzilla is preferred today.
ChangeLog:
* config-ml.in: Replace gcc-bugs@ with Bugzilla link.
* symlink-tree: Replace gcc-bugs@ with Bugzilla link.
fixincludes/ChangeLog:
* README: Replace gcc-bugs@ with Bugzilla link.
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
* lib/file-format
