Richard Earnshaw wrote:
On 03/07/15 16:27, Alan Lawrence wrote:
The previous patch caused a regression in
gcc.c-torture/execute/20040709-1.c at -O0 (only), and the new
align_rec2.c test fails, both outputting an illegal assembler
instruction (ldrd on an odd-numbered reg) from output_move_double
On 03/07/15 16:27, Alan Lawrence wrote:
> The previous patch caused a regression in
> gcc.c-torture/execute/20040709-1.c at -O0 (only), and the new
> align_rec2.c test fails, both outputting an illegal assembler
> instruction (ldrd on an odd-numbered reg) from output_move_double in
> arm.c. Most ro
The previous patch caused a regression in gcc.c-torture/execute/20040709-1.c at
-O0 (only), and the new align_rec2.c test fails, both outputting an illegal
assembler instruction (ldrd on an odd-numbered reg) from output_move_double in
arm.c. Most routes have checks against such an illegal instru
