On 3/22/25 8:37 AM, Nathaniel Shead wrote:
On Mon, Mar 17, 2025 at 09:42:13AM -0400, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 3/14/25 9:28 AM, Nathaniel Shead wrote:
Bootstrapped and regtested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, OK for trunk?
Alternatively, could still mark gnu_inline functions as non-vague, we
just need
On Mon, Mar 17, 2025 at 09:42:13AM -0400, Jason Merrill wrote:
> On 3/14/25 9:28 AM, Nathaniel Shead wrote:
> > Bootstrapped and regtested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, OK for trunk?
> >
> > Alternatively, could still mark gnu_inline functions as non-vague, we
> > just need to do so more aggressively; b
On 3/14/25 9:28 AM, Nathaniel Shead wrote:
Bootstrapped and regtested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, OK for trunk?
Alternatively, could still mark gnu_inline functions as non-vague, we
just need to do so more aggressively; but given this is specifically to
solve a modules issue I felt may as well keep
Bootstrapped and regtested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, OK for trunk?
Alternatively, could still mark gnu_inline functions as non-vague, we
just need to do so more aggressively; but given this is specifically to
solve a modules issue I felt may as well keep it confined to there given
your previous comm
