Richard Biener writes:
> On Wed, 14 Jun 2023, Richard Sandiford wrote:
>
>> Richard Biener via Gcc-patches writes:
>> > The function is only meaningful for LOOP_VINFO_MASKS processing so
>> > inline it into the single use.
>> >
>> > Bootstrapped and tested on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu, OK?
>> >
>>
On Wed, 14 Jun 2023, Richard Sandiford wrote:
> Richard Biener via Gcc-patches writes:
> > The function is only meaningful for LOOP_VINFO_MASKS processing so
> > inline it into the single use.
> >
> > Bootstrapped and tested on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu, OK?
> >
> > * tree-vect-loop.cc (vect_g
Richard Biener via Gcc-patches writes:
> The function is only meaningful for LOOP_VINFO_MASKS processing so
> inline it into the single use.
>
> Bootstrapped and tested on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu, OK?
>
> * tree-vect-loop.cc (vect_get_max_nscalars_per_iter): Inline
> into ...
>
The function is only meaningful for LOOP_VINFO_MASKS processing so
inline it into the single use.
Bootstrapped and tested on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu, OK?
* tree-vect-loop.cc (vect_get_max_nscalars_per_iter): Inline
into ...
(vect_verify_full_masking): ... this.
---
gcc/t