On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 03:02:48PM +0900, Chung-Lin Tang wrote:
> Ping x 2.
I like the general idea of moving the gomp_fatal stuff up, out of the
plugins, but we now have another plugin, so it can't apply as is.
And in the intelmic plugin, adding return true; after abort (); looks wrong.
So, can y
Ping x 2.
On 2016/1/5 11:22 PM, Chung-Lin Tang wrote:
> Patch has been updated to accommodate the gomp_fini_device() removal changes.
> And ping.
>
> On 2015/12/14 11:47 PM, Chung-Lin Tang wrote:
>> [sorry, forgot to C gcc-patches in last send]
>>
>> Hi Jakub,
>> these patches are a revision of
Patch has been updated to accommodate the gomp_fini_device() removal changes.
And ping.
On 2015/12/14 11:47 PM, Chung-Lin Tang wrote:
> [sorry, forgot to C gcc-patches in last send]
>
> Hi Jakub,
> these patches are a revision of
> https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-08/msg01701.html
> since
[sorry, forgot to C gcc-patches in last send]
Hi Jakub,
these patches are a revision of
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-08/msg01701.html
since that patch set have bitrotten by now.
To recap the original situation, due to the way that device locks are held
when entering plugin code, a GOM
