On 9/30/21 12:52, Patrick Palka wrote:
When parsing a variadic trait expression, we build up the list of
trailing arguments in reverse, but we're neglecting to reverse the list
to its true order afterwards. This causes us to confuse the meaning of
e.g. __is_xible(x, y, z) and __is_xible(x, z, y)
When parsing a variadic trait expression, we build up the list of
trailing arguments in reverse, but we're neglecting to reverse the list
to its true order afterwards. This causes us to confuse the meaning of
e.g. __is_xible(x, y, z) and __is_xible(x, z, y).
Note that bug isn't exposed in the sta
