On Fri, 2024-09-27 at 10:21 -0500, Thor Preimesberger wrote:
> That's all correct. I think I got it.
>
> There are times where the code is emitting a json::object* that is
> contained in another json object. Is it good style to return these
> still as a unique_ptr?
Probably not. If you have a j
That's all correct. I think I got it.
There are times where the code is emitting a json::object* that is
contained in another json object. Is it good style to return these
still as a unique_ptr? I'm looking over what I wrote again, and in
some parts I wrap the new json object in a unique_ptr (as a
On Sat, 2024-09-21 at 22:49 -0500, -thor wrote:
> From: thor
>
> This is the second revision of:
>
>
> https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2024-September/662849.html
>
> I've incorporated the feedback given both by Richard and David - I
> didn't
> find any memory leaks when testing
On Sun, Sep 22, 2024 at 5:49 AM -thor wrote:
>
> From: thor
>
> This is the second revision of:
>
> https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2024-September/662849.html
>
> I've incorporated the feedback given both by Richard and David - I didn't
> find any memory leaks when testing in valg
From: thor
This is the second revision of:
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2024-September/662849.html
I've incorporated the feedback given both by Richard and David - I didn't
find any memory leaks when testing in valgrind :)
As before: This patch allows the compiler to dump GENERI
