On 6/3/21 11:39 AM, Aldy Hernandez via Gcc-patches wrote:
Andrew had some minor suggestions and cleanups after I posted this.
Andrew, is this what you had in mind?
Aldy
On Sat, May 29, 2021 at 6:06 AM Jeff Law wrote:
On 5/27/2021 2:55 AM, Aldy Hernandez via Gcc-patches wrote:
Right now, r
): Add
> > argument to get_tree_range.
> > * vr-values.c (vr_values::range_of_expr): Same.
> > * gimple-range-tests.cc: New file.
> Both patches in this series are fine.
>
> Thanks,
> Jeff
>
From fe8f95d2baf92fc5fa967c5d183c5480f003e15d Mon Sep
On 5/27/2021 2:55 AM, Aldy Hernandez via Gcc-patches wrote:
Right now, range_of_expr only works with constants, SSA names, and
pointers. Anything else gets returned as VARYING. This patch adds the
capability to deal with arbitrary expressions, inasmuch as these
tree codes are implemented in
Right now, range_of_expr only works with constants, SSA names, and
pointers. Anything else gets returned as VARYING. This patch adds the
capability to deal with arbitrary expressions, inasmuch as these
tree codes are implemented in range-ops.cc.
This will give us the ability to ask for the range
