> On 02/07/25 07:26, Kugan Vivekanandarajah wrote:
> >
> >
> > >
> > > Given the latest few patches that you have committed, is this patch
> > > necessary
> > > anymore? I have not fully understood the new logic as I was on holiday
> > > last
> > > week, but it looks like the propagation is oc
On 02/07/25 07:26, Kugan Vivekanandarajah wrote:
Given the latest few patches that you have committed, is this patch necessary
anymore? I have not fully understood the new logic as I was on holiday last
week, but it looks like the propagation is occurring correctly now?
I think you are ref
>
> Given the latest few patches that you have committed, is this patch necessary
> anymore? I have not fully understood the new logic as I was on holiday last
> week, but it looks like the propagation is occurring correctly now?
>
I think you are referring to the patch “Avoid some lost AFDO p
On 17/06/25 18:35, Jan Hubicka wrote:
External email: Use caution opening links or attachments
From: Dhruv Chawla
This patch modifies afdo_set_bb_count to propagate profile information
to outline copies of functions if they are not inlined. This information
gets lost otherwise.
Signed-off-b
On 17/06/25 18:35, Jan Hubicka wrote:
External email: Use caution opening links or attachments
From: Dhruv Chawla
This patch modifies afdo_set_bb_count to propagate profile information
to outline copies of functions if they are not inlined. This information
gets lost otherwise.
Signed-off-b
> From: Dhruv Chawla
>
> This patch modifies afdo_set_bb_count to propagate profile information
> to outline copies of functions if they are not inlined. This information
> gets lost otherwise.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dhruv Chawla
>
> gcc/ChangeLog:
>
> * gcc/auto-profile.cc (count_info): Ad
From: Dhruv Chawla
This patch modifies afdo_set_bb_count to propagate profile information
to outline copies of functions if they are not inlined. This information
gets lost otherwise.
Signed-off-by: Dhruv Chawla
gcc/ChangeLog:
* gcc/auto-profile.cc (count_info): Adjust comments.
