On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 9:00 AM, Segher Boessenkool
wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 08, 2014 at 10:53:21AM -0500, David Edelsohn wrote:
>> As we both noticed, there are a few problems with this patch, so I'll
>> wait for a revised version.
>
> Here it is. It took a bit longer because of a latent problem in
On Mon, Dec 08, 2014 at 10:53:21AM -0500, David Edelsohn wrote:
> As we both noticed, there are a few problems with this patch, so I'll
> wait for a revised version.
Here it is. It took a bit longer because of a latent problem in combine
(ugh!) that caused mysterious failures in guality (double u
On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 10:41 AM, David Edelsohn wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 9:18 AM, Segher Boessenkool
> wrote:
>> This implements addc, addic, adde, addze, addme, subfc, subfic, subfe,
>> subfze, subfme. Some of those in multiple forms: canonical RTL for the
>> "immediate" insns has four f
On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 9:18 AM, Segher Boessenkool
wrote:
> This implements addc, addic, adde, addze, addme, subfc, subfic, subfe,
> subfze, subfme. Some of those in multiple forms: canonical RTL for the
> "immediate" insns has four forms; subfX has a special form for subtracting
> a register fro
This implements addc, addic, adde, addze, addme, subfc, subfic, subfe,
subfze, subfme. Some of those in multiple forms: canonical RTL for the
"immediate" insns has four forms; subfX has a special form for subtracting
a register from itself.
All these new insns get type "add" for now.
2014-12-08
