Re: [PATCH 05/08] PR jit/63854: Fix double-initialization within tree-pretty-print.c

2014-12-01 Thread Jeff Law
On 11/25/14 18:39, David Malcolm wrote: Running various JIT testcases under valgrid showed this one-time leak: 8,464 (336 direct, 8,128 indirect) bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 144 of 147 at 0x4A081D4: calloc (in /usr/lib64/valgrind/vgpreload_memcheck-amd64-linux.so)

[PATCH 05/08] PR jit/63854: Fix double-initialization within tree-pretty-print.c

2014-11-25 Thread David Malcolm
Running various JIT testcases under valgrid showed this one-time leak: 8,464 (336 direct, 8,128 indirect) bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 144 of 147 at 0x4A081D4: calloc (in /usr/lib64/valgrind/vgpreload_memcheck-amd64-linux.so) by 0x5DF4EA0: xcalloc (xmalloc.c:162)