On Fri, Jun 28, 2024 at 2:14 PM Thomas Schwinge wrote:
>
> Hi!
>
> On 2013-07-26T11:04:32-0400, David Malcolm wrote:
> > Introduce a new gen-pass-instances.awk script, and use it at build time
> > to make a pass-instances.def from passes.def.
>
> (The script has later been rewritten and extended,
Hi!
On 2013-07-26T11:04:32-0400, David Malcolm wrote:
> Introduce a new gen-pass-instances.awk script, and use it at build time
> to make a pass-instances.def from passes.def.
(The script has later been rewritten and extended, but the issue I'm
discussing is relevant already in its original vers
On Wed, 2013-07-31 12:18:42 -0400, David Malcolm wrote:
> On Wed, 2013-07-31 at 18:00 +0200, Jan-Benedict Glaw wrote:
> > That's why I'm running the build robot :) Once I've got some
> > time[tm], I'll spend it a small web frontend to look into the basic
> > information (which builds worked/faile
On Wed, 2013-07-31 at 18:00 +0200, Jan-Benedict Glaw wrote:
> On Wed, 2013-07-31 11:31:35 -0400, David Malcolm wrote:
> > On Wed, 2013-07-31 at 11:36 +0200, Jan-Benedict Glaw wrote:
> > > On Wed, 2013-07-31 10:34:10 +0200, Jan-Benedict Glaw
> > > wrote:
> [breakage with mawk]
> > > > It seems th
On Wed, 2013-07-31 11:31:35 -0400, David Malcolm wrote:
> On Wed, 2013-07-31 at 11:36 +0200, Jan-Benedict Glaw wrote:
> > On Wed, 2013-07-31 10:34:10 +0200, Jan-Benedict Glaw
> > wrote:
[breakage with mawk]
> > > It seems this does only happen on one of the three running build
> > > clients. Tha
On Wed, 2013-07-31 at 11:36 +0200, Jan-Benedict Glaw wrote:
> On Wed, 2013-07-31 10:34:10 +0200, Jan-Benedict Glaw
> wrote:
> > On Tue, 2013-07-30 20:50:27 -0400, David Malcolm
> > wrote:
> > [...]
> > > Committed to trunk as r201359, having double-checked that it
> > > bootstrapped by itself o
On Wed, 2013-07-31 10:34:10 +0200, Jan-Benedict Glaw wrote:
> On Tue, 2013-07-30 20:50:27 -0400, David Malcolm wrote:
> [...]
> > Committed to trunk as r201359, having double-checked that it
> > bootstrapped by itself on top of what had gone before, and that the
> > testsuite results were unaffec
On Wed, 2013-07-31 10:34:10 +0200, Jan-Benedict Glaw wrote:
> On Tue, 2013-07-30 20:50:27 -0400, David Malcolm wrote:
> [...]
> > Committed to trunk as r201359, having double-checked that it
> > bootstrapped by itself on top of what had gone before, and that the
> > testsuite results were unaffec
On Tue, 2013-07-30 20:50:27 -0400, David Malcolm wrote:
[...]
> Committed to trunk as r201359, having double-checked that it
> bootstrapped by itself on top of what had gone before, and that the
> testsuite results were unaffected by it (on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu).
My build robot chokes on it.
On Mon, 2013-07-29 at 14:01 -0600, Jeff Law wrote:
> On 07/26/2013 09:04 AM, David Malcolm wrote:
> > Introduce a new gen-pass-instances.awk script, and use it at build time
> > to make a pass-instances.def from passes.def.
> >
> > An example of the result can be seen at:
> >
> >http://dmalcolm
On 07/26/2013 09:04 AM, David Malcolm wrote:
Introduce a new gen-pass-instances.awk script, and use it at build time
to make a pass-instances.def from passes.def.
An example of the result can be seen at:
http://dmalcolm.fedorapeople.org/gcc/2013-07-25/pass-instances.def
The generated pass-i
Introduce a new gen-pass-instances.awk script, and use it at build time
to make a pass-instances.def from passes.def.
An example of the result can be seen at:
http://dmalcolm.fedorapeople.org/gcc/2013-07-25/pass-instances.def
The generated pass-instances.def contains similar content to passes.
Introduce a new gen-pass-instances.awk script, and use it at build time
to make a pass-instances.def from passes.def.
An example of the result can be seen at:
http://dmalcolm.fedorapeople.org/gcc/2013-07-25/pass-instances.def
The generated pass-instances.def contains similar content to passes.
13 matches
Mail list logo
