Alex Coplan writes:
> In the case that !insn->is_debug_insn () && next->is_debug_insn (), this
> function was missing an update of the prev pointer on the first nondebug
> insn following the sequence of debug insns starting at next.
>
> This can lead to corruption of the insn chain, in that we end
In the case that !insn->is_debug_insn () && next->is_debug_insn (), this
function was missing an update of the prev pointer on the first nondebug
insn following the sequence of debug insns starting at next.
This can lead to corruption of the insn chain, in that we end up with:
insn->next_any_in
