:juzhe.zh...@rivai.ai>; Pan Li
> <mailto:pan2...@intel.com>; Kito Cheng <mailto:kito.ch...@sifive.com>;
> Vineet Gupta <mailto:vine...@rivosinc.com>
> *Subject:* [PATCH 0/6] RISC-V: frm state-machine improvements
> Hi,
>
> This came out of
t Gupta
Date: 2025-05-10 04:27
To: gcc-patches
CC: gnu-toolchain; Jeff Law; Robin Dapp; Juzhe Zhong; Pan Li; Kito Cheng;
Vineet Gupta
Subject: [PATCH 0/6] RISC-V: frm state-machine improvements
Hi,
This came out of Rivos perf team reporting (shoutout to Siavash) that
some of the SPEC2017 w
On 5/10/25 06:49, Jeff Law wrote:
> On 5/9/25 2:27 PM, Vineet Gupta wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> This came out of Rivos perf team reporting (shoutout to Siavash) that
>> some of the SPEC2017 workloads had unnecessary FRM wiggles, when
>> none were needed. The writes in particular could be expensive.
>>
>> I
On 5/9/25 2:27 PM, Vineet Gupta wrote:
Hi,
This came out of Rivos perf team reporting (shoutout to Siavash) that
some of the SPEC2017 workloads had unnecessary FRM wiggles, when
none were needed. The writes in particular could be expensive.
I started with reduced test for PR/119164 from blen
Hi,
This came out of Rivos perf team reporting (shoutout to Siavash) that
some of the SPEC2017 workloads had unnecessary FRM wiggles, when
none were needed. The writes in particular could be expensive.
I started with reduced test for PR/119164 from blender:node_testure_util.c.
However in trying
