Re: [PATCH 0/5] Yet more use of rtx subclasses; possible rl78 bug

2014-09-09 Thread DJ Delorie
> > I fixed this (in patch 5) by introducing a new local rtx "set" for the > > result of single_set, and hence not overwriting "insn" within the loop. > > That said I've only tested that it compiles for rl78, I've not yet > > forced line 3605 to execute, and not simulated the resulting code. > See

Re: [PATCH 0/5] Yet more use of rtx subclasses; possible rl78 bug

2014-09-09 Thread Jeff Law
On 09/08/14 15:29, David Malcolm wrote: Here's another 5 patches that make use of rtx_def subclasses, which are non-trivial enough *not* to fall under the pre-approval Jeff granted. In particular, patches 4 and 5 update the signature of recog_memoized and single_set respectively to require an rt

[PATCH 0/5] Yet more use of rtx subclasses; possible rl78 bug

2014-09-08 Thread David Malcolm
Here's another 5 patches that make use of rtx_def subclasses, which are non-trivial enough *not* to fall under the pre-approval Jeff granted. In particular, patches 4 and 5 update the signature of recog_memoized and single_set respectively to require an rtx_insn * rather than just an rtx. These l