On 2/16/23 00:17, Fei Gao wrote:
ping.
We are in stage4 of our development cycle -- meaning that the focus is
on regression bugfixing, not new features, optimizations and the like.
This patch is in the queue and will be looked at once we move back into
stage1 development for gcc-14.
jeff
ping.
BR,
Fei
On 2023-02-03 16:52 Fei Gao wrote:
>
>
>Gentle ping.
>
>The patch I previously submitted:
>| Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2022 00:38:08 -0800
>| Subject: [PATCH] RISC-V: optimize stack manipulation in save-restore
>| Message-ID:
>
>I split the patches as per Palmer's review comment.
>
>BR
ping.
BR
Fei
On 2023-02-03 16:52 Fei Gao wrote:
>
>
>Gentle ping.
>
>The patch I previously submitted:
>| Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2022 00:38:08 -0800
>| Subject: [PATCH] RISC-V: optimize stack manipulation in save-restore
>| Message-ID:
>
>I split the patches as per Palmer's review comment.
>
>BR
>
Gentle ping.
The patch I previously submitted:
| Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2022 00:38:08 -0800
| Subject: [PATCH] RISC-V: optimize stack manipulation in save-restore
| Message-ID:
I split the patches as per Palmer's review comment.
BR
Fei
On 2022-12-01 18:03 Fei Gao wrote:
>
>The patches allow less
The patches allow less instructions to be used in stack allocation
and deallocation if save-restore enabled, and also make the stack
manipulation codes more readable.
Fei Gao (3):
RISC-V: add a new parameter in riscv_first_stack_step.
RISC-V: optimize stack manipulation in save-restore
RIS