Re: [PATCH 0/2] Final cleanup in move to ISL

2015-08-27 Thread Sebastian Pop
Tobias Grosser wrote: > From the graphite side, this is right. One thing I am not sure about if we > need to > keep these flags as 'do-nothing' flags to meet certain backward compatibility > guarantees in gcc. The patch keeps all the flags and makes them alias of a single flag -floop-nest-optimiz

Re: [PATCH 0/2] Final cleanup in move to ISL

2015-08-26 Thread Tobias Grosser
On 08/27/2015 12:14 AM, Sebastian Pop wrote: Hi, Richi suggested at the Cauldron that it would be good to have graphite more automatic and with fewer flags. The first patch removes the -funroll-and-jam pass that does not seem very stable or useful for now. The second patch removes the other -f

[PATCH 0/2] Final cleanup in move to ISL

2015-08-26 Thread Sebastian Pop
Hi, Richi suggested at the Cauldron that it would be good to have graphite more automatic and with fewer flags. The first patch removes the -funroll-and-jam pass that does not seem very stable or useful for now. The second patch removes the other -floop-* flags that were part of the old graphite