Re: [PATCH]AArch64: remove ls64 from being mandatory on armv8.7-a..

2024-02-20 Thread Richard Sandiford
Tamar Christina writes: > Hi, this I a new version of the patch updating some additional tests > because some of the LTO tests required a newer binutils than my distro had. > > --- > > The Arm Architectural Reference Manual (Version J.a, section A2.9 on > FEAT_LS64) > shows that ls64 is an optio

RE: [PATCH]AArch64: remove ls64 from being mandatory on armv8.7-a..

2024-02-15 Thread Tamar Christina
Hi, this I a new version of the patch updating some additional tests because some of the LTO tests required a newer binutils than my distro had. --- The Arm Architectural Reference Manual (Version J.a, section A2.9 on FEAT_LS64) shows that ls64 is an optional extensions and should not be enabled

[PATCH]AArch64: remove ls64 from being mandatory on armv8.7-a..

2024-02-14 Thread Tamar Christina
Hi All, The Arm Architectural Reference Manual (Version J.a, section A2.9 on FEAT_LS64) shows that ls64 is an optional extensions and should not be enabled by default for Armv8.7-a. This drops it from the mandatory bits for the architecture and brings GCC inline with LLVM and the achitecture. No